Crossing over to Children’s Books

Today, John Grisham’s first children’s book is being released: Theodore Boone: Kid Lawyer. Though not speculative fiction, this got me thinking about “grown-up” writers who turn to writing books for kids.

Of course, as Joni pointed out, “Lots of us have either day jobs that involve writing for adults or have done other books, often nonfiction, for adults first.” Then there are those authors of the past who were writing for adults, but whose books are now often read by children or teenagers: Mark Twain, Jules Verne, J. R. R. Tolkien, and Ursula Le Guin would fit this category, I believe.

But I’m really thinking about the famous names today, so let’s look at a few of them.

You can see my complete review of Theodore Boone: Kid Lawyer (Dutton) at the New York Journal of Books. The short review is, good idea, mediocre book. It wouldn’t have sold if one of us wrote it. I don’t blame the author for this so much as the publishing process, and the public who will no doubt buy the book anyway, based on his name. I can’t guess why he decided to try writing for kids, but I can guess why this effort (in my opinion) failed — he wrote it too much like one of his adult books, just with a kid main character.

I also took a look at one of Clive Cussler’s books for children, The Adventures of Vin Fiz (Philomel, 2006). The jacket flap claims this is in “the classic tradition of Chitty Chitty Bang Bang.” The book does have a “classic” feel, if by classic you mean old-fashioned, with bland kid characters, lots of telling rather than showing, and a cheerfully condescending adult narrator’s voice. Maybe Cussler wanted to re-create a “wholesome” book like the ones he loved as a child, or maybe he just didn’t know that standards of children’s literature have changed. Either way, I doubt this book would have sold without the famous name. The story, about kids who get an enchanted box that can transform any toy into the real thing, has been done before — and better.  It’s sad, because this “true life adventurer” who has “discovered more than 60 sunken ships” surely has a more exciting tale to tell.

Lest you think I’m simply jealous and snarky, I’d better look at some (in my opinion) successes. James Patterson, the biggest name in publishing, was recently named author of the year by the Children’s Choice Book Awards. His Maximum Ride series (Little, Brown) about kids who are 2% bird is an innovative concept, and the books deserve their place on the best-seller list. I just started reading The Dangerous Days of Daniel X, which is a definite page turner. It opens with the main character describing how, when he was three, his parents were murdered by a vicious alien. This man does not talk down to kids! He has a new Witch & Wizard series, and I’m willing to bet this isn’t some cheap imitation of a classic.

Neil Gaiman is another author who seems to imbue each of his books with magic, from picture books such as The Wolves in the Wall to middle grade novels such as Coraline and the Newbery winning The Graveyard Book (most HarperCollins), to his graphic novels and adult work. You may not always like the bizarre and disturbing worlds he creates, but they are never dull! And he knows that kids are supposed to be the heroes in children’s books. His are typically stronger than the adults around them.

Stepping away from speculative fiction again, we get Carl Hiaasan, who has been successful with his middle grade novels Hoot, Flush, and Scat (Knopf). These have something in common with his adult mysteries — oddball characters and plenty of action — but they also have a solidly middle grade feel, with realistic characters struggling to make a difference in their world.

Sherman Alexie apparently wasn’t trying to write for young people with The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian (Little, Brown, 2007), but his editors saw the crossover potential. Alexie tells his stories with humor and heart, drawing on his own unusual experiences as a youth.

I can imagine several reasons successful adult authors might want to turn to writing for children. Perhaps their own children have gotten them interested in telling stories to kids. Maybe they’ve remembered a childhood incident that would make the basis of a good book. Maybe they want to try something new. Or maybe they want to tap into another market, one that has remained stable in a down economy.

Regardless of the reasons, the ones who succeed are the ones who have a grasp of modern kids and modern kids’ literature. The ones who realize that books for children are different from books for adults, but that doesn’t mean they’re condescending or preachy. The ones who understand that children’s books are not easier or less important.

So now it’s your turn — what’s your opinion on the books I’ve mentioned? Any others that fit this topic?

Chris may start writing for adults someday, because, you know, it would be easier.

9 Comments

Filed under Chris Eboch

9 Responses to Crossing over to Children’s Books

  1. Interesting post! I think the most successful (writing-wise, not necessarily money-wise) crossover authors are the ones who’ve done their homework. That’s why James Patterson, for example, has YA books that work, because they fit into what’s current and exciting in today’s market.

    As for those books that don’t work as well, like you said, the blame lays more with the publishers than with the authors. If the publishers are willing to put out sub-par books because they know they’ll sell, I guess there’s not a lot of incentive for those authors to do their homework.

  2. Natalie Aguirre

    I really enjoyed Witch & Wizard, Neil Gaiman’s books, & The Absolutely True Story of a Part-time Indian. I might read the other book you mentioned by James Patterson, because I really like him as an author. I doubt I’ll read the one by John Grisham or the others you listed as mediocre. There are too many good books by children’s authors to read. Thanks for the post.

  3. Parker Peevyhouse

    Interesting look at this trend. It does seem easy for a writer to misunderstand the childrens’ market if he’s never written for it before.

    I love Neil Gaiman’s books–he seems to really understand how to write for different ages and how to take young readers seriously.

  4. Love Neil Gaiman’s Coraline!

    To me, what’s interesting is the list of books you mention that weren’t originally targeted at young audiences, but are now read by them. Take the Golden Compass, for instance. I don’t know for sure if the author set out to create a book that would be classified as “YA”. But, I’ve heard it classified as such (I’ve seen it stocked that way in bookstores a few times). But even if the author did set out to do that, as I read it, it’s just a great fantasy. I would never describe it as “It’s a YA book that adults would love too,” but I think it’s fair to describe it either way.

    I struggle with that with the book I’m working on right now. I think I *could* just call it “fantasy”. On the other hand I think I could also call it YA Fantasy (because of the protagonist, tone, etc.) Is that bad? Should a book be clearly situated in one realm or the other?

  5. Thanks for the book recommendations. I gotta get reading! I too am disgusted when a mediocre book gets published because of the author’s name.

  6. Nick

    Oh god I love that Sherman Alexie book. One of my all-time favs. I also liked the Maximum Ride series for the first couple of books, though began to lose interest around book four. I wasn’t so hot on the other Patterson titles you mentioned, but overall, he’s definitely nailed the kid/teen voice.

  7. Ooh, I’m now more curious about the sub-par books on your list… just to see if I agree. Partly because I’m not entirely convinced that writing a book “just like you might write one for adults” is by definition wrong… but I guess it depends on what you mean. (What do you mean? Too intellectual or abstract? Too slow-moving? [To me, that would be a failing for an adult book, too.] Too adult-oriented rather than kid-oriented? Too dark? Something else?)

    Thanks a lot, Chris. Like I really need more reading that I then will agree with you was a waste of time. ;)

    Very interesting post, thanks!

  8. Chris Eboch

    What do I mean by suggesting that you shouldn’t write kids books like you write adult books? Content is part of it — though I don’t think anything is necessarily off-limits for kids books, especially YA, you need more awareness of audience age. MG mysteries will tend not to have a lot of gruesome dead bodies, for example (Hiaasen’s adult mysteries have twisted characters and a high body count; he tones things down for his middle grades).

    And adults may not mind a story from a teenager’s point of view, or a book that focuses on children some of the time and adults some of the time. But in general, kids want a story that focuses on a child main character. (In Cussler’s Vin Fiz, we meet the parents before we meet the kids.)

    It also seems a lot of adult books have lengthy descriptions. I’m not crazy about that, but most readers must be okay with it. I think that was Grisham’s mistake, feeling like he could take as much time with character development and set up as he usually does (from what I’ve heard). No doubt some kids like lush descriptions as well, but I think most want to know what’s happening quickly. Mostly, I think children’s books have higher standards, especially for pacing!

    • Parker Peevyhouse

      I see what you’re saying, Chris. Childrens’ books do have to have faster pacing and a quick introduction to the mc. It also seems to me that they have to be more interesting–any boring segment (read long, introspective section) can be doom for a kids’ book.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s